I work with funds and family offices where there's genuine mandate alignment - as an extension of the investment team, not an external vendor. I bring operator context to technical diligence, sourcing Insights built on domain depth, and thesis development grounded in first-principles thinking.
TRL assessment, manufacturability analysis, market timing, and founder quality - written as investment signal, not background reading. I apply dimensions most diligence processes skip: prototyping debt, supply chain risk, TRL inflation, and hardware-specific founder-market fit.
Structured sourcing pipelines for hardware-focused mandates. Pre-screened, technically contextualized, and aligned to your thesis. I surface what a hardware-literate operator would notice - not just what shows up in founder databases.
Sector landscape maps, investment thesis development, and first-principles conviction-building for emerging deeptech verticals. Built for GPs who need to orient fast without losing depth - and that hold up under scrutiny, not just brief a team.
A structured deeptech access framework for family offices exploring direct venture exposure: thesis definition, deal qualification, portfolio monitoring, and ongoing advisory. A capital allocation lens - not a generic fund pitch dressed up as advice.
Structured assessment for accelerator cohorts, grant panels, and demo days. Actionable feedback from an operator lens.
Commissioned research across deeptech verticals - green hydrogen, semiconductors, defence autonomy, thin films, industrial robotics. Grounded in technical depth and commercial realism.
I keep a narrow mandate by design. The more specific my focus, the more useful I am. If you are outside these parameters, I would rather say so upfront.